EUROPE
English

Validation process modification and evaluation of a novel professional device which detects atrial fibrillation and adapts its blood pressure measurement algorithm

Stergiou, George S.; Kyriakoulis, Konstantinos G.; Bountzona, Ioanna; Menti, Ariadni; Destounis, Antonios; Kalogeropoulos, Petros; Kollias, Anastasios

Objective

Blood pressure (BP) measurement in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients is problematic and automated monitors are regarded as inaccurate. The optimal procedure for validating BP monitors in AF is questionable. This study evaluated the accuracy of a novel professional oscillometric upper-arm cuff device (Microlife WatchBP Office), which has an algorithm for detecting AF and then applies an AF-specific BP measurement algorithm. BP variability, which is inherently increased in AF patients, was considered in the analysis.

Results

Thirty-five subjects with 105 paired test/reference BP measurements were included (mean age 76.3 ± 8.4 years, reference SBP/DBP 128.2 ± 19.5/72.5 ± 12.1 mmHg, pulse rate 68.3 ± 14.9 bpm). Validation Criterion 1 (mean difference ± SD) was 0.0 ± 7.7/0.2 ± 7.0 mmHg in all 105 BP pairs (threshold ≤5 ± 8 mmHg). Criterion 1 was 0.5 ± 6.1/−0.2 ± 6.8 mmHg in 18 subjects (54 BP pairs) with low reference BP variability and −0.6 ± 9.2/0.6 ± 7.3 mmHg in 17 (51 pairs) with high variability. Criterion 1 did not differ in pulse rate < 70 vs. ≥ 70 bpm Validation Criterion 2 (SD of differences for 35 individuals) was 5.38/6.20 mmHg (SBP/DBP; threshold ≤6.95/6.95).

Conclusion

A technology which detects AF and activates an AF-specific BP measurement algorithm introduces a challenging solution for clinical practice. Validation of BP monitors in AF patients should not ignore their inherently high BP variability.

Click here for more information

Related products

WatchBP Office

View products

Customer support

Contact customer support if you would like our friendly agents to help you resolve your issues.

find support